BidWERX connects opportunity discovery, source-document analysis, pursuit decision support, response evaluation, and partner matching into one structured intelligence platform — organized around how federal pursuit work actually moves.
Each module creates context for the next step, so teams can move from discovery to decision to submission without rebuilding the pursuit record from scratch.
Matching helps users search, filter, compare, and move better-fit opportunities into source analysis with the right context already attached. Every opportunity carries forward the alignment signals that informed why it surfaced — no re-keying, no re-search, no losing context between steps.
FitScore supports opportunity triage by surfacing alignment signals across available SAM.gov fields, capability indicators, set-aside status, certifications, and source context. FitScore is not win probability, a guaranteed outcome, or predictive certainty — it's structured information that helps your team decide what's worth a closer look.
Source Analysis turns solicitations, NOFOs, attachments, and instructions into a structured view of requirements, risks, evaluation criteria, questions, and response outline inputs. Five tabs cover every angle reviewers will care about — extracted, organized, and ready to inform every downstream step.
Some federal opportunities require capabilities no single organization has. Partner Network gives Org accounts a way to find the right teaming partners — and to be found by others who need what you bring. BidWERX handles the matching automatically; you handle the relationship.
Most pursuit decisions get made from memory and gut feel — and they're hard to defend when the team disagrees. The Go/No-Go Scorecard evaluates each opportunity across nine criteria, returns a recommendation, and shows the rationale your team can review, push back on, and align around. Replace the hour-long debate with a structured decision your BD lead, capture manager, and executive sponsor can all read in five minutes.
Response Evaluation helps users review draft responses against compliance, responsiveness, risk, persuasiveness, and available evaluation criteria so teams can improve content before submission. Five evaluator-aligned dimensions, one structured view.
Academic Evaluation Mode is purpose-built for review of scholarly works — manuscripts, journal articles, abstracts, conference papers, and other academic content. Get reviewer-aligned feedback that mirrors how academic peer reviewers, editors, and committee members actually assess scholarly writing — clarity of argument, methodological rigor, evidence quality, and presentation — before you submit.
Every funding agency, program, and reviewer scores differently. User-Defined Rubrics let your team build custom evaluation rubrics from any source — FOA-specific scoring criteria, prior reviewer feedback, journal guidelines, internal review standards — and apply them to every response evaluation. The evaluator-aware intelligence is the same; the criteria are yours.
Help your organization find better-fit opportunities, decide which pursuits are worth the effort, and submit responses that win.
